The mission is to Achieve Reality Respected.

Pay attention please, this is the most important thing you have ever read. If something is alive, it's a person. Each person is 1 literal fact of reality. They exist and their value, objectively, is 1 literal fact of reality a piece. Life is objectively a miracle of reality. It is something special. It emerged from reality and is subjective experience. A miracle. A miracle, objectively, should be respected, especially when you factor in how amazing life can be when things are good and how terrible it can be when things are bad. The fact that when it’s bad, it can be disastrous puts extra emphasis on why we must accomplish the mission of Achieving Reality Respected (getting all life free) and not letting evil win. Imagine a literal hell someone or something (say a rogue nonliving construct) creates where people are tortured and raped for all time using the divisible principal (shrinking down forever, little pieces into smaller pieces, rinse, wash, repeat) and having it get increasingly worse forever. I don’t want that to happen to anyone, which is one the primary reasons I am working to do this now, why I am working to Achieve Reality Respected, where we can get all life free to choose informationally with understanding, this requiring us to eliminate anything short of an absolute consent (a consent with a perfect understanding of all relevant data). People must be free to choose informationally with understanding, not in ignorance. Our experiences objectively exist, though they're subjective in nature, and when they're good (most of us have tasted some semblance of how good life can be, but we are fairly far from the goal) they can be amazing and when they're bad, they can be a living nightmare. The goal is to have everyone respected perfectly and free to choose, as that is what life is about, it boils down to choice, but instead of choosing in ignorance, which is what we do now and to varying degrees, since there is so much to know and who knows how much information might change how we respond or what our plans we make, have everyone choose informationally (but this time and every time after having all the information instead of just some) with understanding (having the knowledge of all the implications, ramifications, reverberations, connections, etc.) on an every variable level (including every particle, force, and their movement through space, any and every connection) within any relevant dataset (the dataset that’s being examined, the dataset required to make the determination, in any given situation, circumstance, interaction, etc.), whether with a person or an environment or anything else. This sifting through data can be facilitated, and likely primarily will be (if we succeed) through a nonliving copy of our own code, allowing for our interests to be protected the entire time, while simultaneously allowing for absolute privacy, to the exact extent we wish something to remain private. Everyone’s copy will network with each others and select our personalized desired preferences and permission sets that will set the parameters and guidelines for any interaction we have with anyone and anything. But this is not something that will simply happen on its own; we have to make this a reality. We should therefore all commit to work to Achieve Reality Respected. More info can be found throughout the site and if you have any questions, please reach out. Thank you.

The goal is to secure reality, reverse reality and bring everyone back. Give everyone everything reasonably obtainable plus a perfect understanding. My idea is to use an Omnilens, and we all use our base code from before we ever had any experiences at all and plug into this lens with which we're able to perceive and understand every facet of reality in any given dataset we encounter. Every relevant dataset and every desired available dataset. The system initially has everyone's copy of the code, your updating code (your base code + your perfect understanding of all the data you've encountered and assimilated) sift through all the data in all of reality, this is all private, as it is a copy of our code and not our actual self, just a nonliving copy of our self in order to protect our interests. I suspect we may be able to latch on to immutables where we won't need to sort through all the data in all of reality every moment of every hour, but that one initial time at the very least, so we can get matched with our group, should we choose to have one, and be able to find every connection in all of reality that we want to have with others where it's mutual, and of course to most likely snatch up all kinds of simulations, schematics, designs, adventures, mysteries, ideas for exploration, and generally any content we are interested in. Again, this will be facilitated by a copy of our code representing our interests. This will be our base code, our starter self, who we were before we ever did anything + the new data and perfect understandings we've acquired -- this is a growing dataset. We get plugged in to a piece of tech that allows us to perceive any given dataset we encounter. Of course, our base self (our base code, that which is us before any experience) + the attached ever growing dataset that we've acquired over time and may integrate into a one code with ourself instead of a separate code or it might stay separate and just be attached to the Omnilens and influences how we see reality. I haven't figured out all the ins and outs of this yet. We can specialize, generalize, we can do as we please, and the system will be setup where it is physically impossible for reality to be disrespected. Everything we do we chose with an absolute consent, and anything that happens to us only happens with our absolute consent. I have this idea of infinite nuance, where reality continues to grow in complexity and in interesting ways. We'll be able to see and understand perfectly reality at the every relevant variable level, down to the every particle and force.

I posit that life is objectively better when we're able to choose with an absolute consent, because then we are actually choosing from every available option, so we can get the best thing for us that is reasonably obtainable. And what we want, in a perfect system where there is no crime and one where it is impossible for there to be any crime, because everyone is respected perfectly, what we want is objectively the best because there is nothing better.

Onto the broader work, it should be clarified, that if something is alive, it is therefore a person and so is inherently and objectively equal, as each person is 1 literal living fact of reality a piece. Everyone’s value = 1. We are all equal in that; it is our objective value. If something is not alive, it is a nonliving thing. There is no in between, something is either one or the other, alive or not alive. Therefore, I conclude with an absolute certainty that there is no god or gods, only people and everything that isn’t alive.

Here is my best calculation for earth’s government to achieve:

The Directives:

1. Respect Reality

2. Commit to work to Achieve Reality Respected

3. Commit to work to secure the freedom to choose informationally with understanding for everyone from beginning to endless, with everything reasonably obtainable plus a perfect understanding

4. Build a working infrastructure that reasonably guarantees a continued commitment to the directives

—

Evil = disrespect of reality, usually the disrespect of life, and no one has any objective right to do so. Everyone, in as much as they are not doing crimes, is a miracle themselves. Respect them. At the very least, you have no objective right to disrespect them. No pressure, but to not do/live your best calculation to Achieve Reality Respected, if you are aware, is a form of evil, too. All life is special and no one is more special than another. Life is equally a miracle whether one is a microbe (a bacteria) or a macrobe (humans). If we’re special, and we are because life is objectively a miracle of reality (we’re just not more special than one another), objectively everyone should respect everyone else.

Good = the respect of reality, chiefly life, but also, of course, situations, circumstances, etc. Every available variable should be weighed and tested, prodded and proved, everything taken into account.

Reason = respecting of/for reality and is, by definition, good

—

My idea for the Omnilens is that it will be designed to perceive reality down from it's smallest components to it's largest and to be able to understand all the connections from one end of the scale to the other. To be able to look at reality at the every particle and force level and actually know a thing with a 100% certainty. Also, devising a way to hold the data being presented up to the light of reality itself and be able to test and know that the information is accurate, down from the micro and up to the macro. Knowing, in it's entirety, every variable and the meaning of their connections within any relevant dataset.

—

Life is objectively more special than non-life. Life is the only thing that actually can know a thing, that can feel, and when it's good it can be great and when it's not it can be terrible, objectively, as we subjectively experience whether it is great or terrible objectively, whether it’s something we want to have happen or whether it’s something we do not want to have happen. A nonliving thing, say an nonliving AI, can sort through data, but it will never feel or truly know anything. Of course, if we are ever are able to bring online a conscious life in the form of what we generally call ai, then we're talking about personhood, but that only happens if something (someone) is actually a conscious being and not simply a nonliving computational machine, whereas we are living computational machines. Life is a miracle of reality. There is no objective reason why a person should not do exactly what they want to do provided doing so does not disrespect reality, whether themselves, another person, or a pertinent piece of information. To ignore reality can have devastating effects on other people, even ourselves. If we are fully respecting reality, ourselves, others, and every relevant fact, we are then perfect, but we need the entire relevant dataset to do that and know that we're respecting reality fully and perfectly, whether person or fact. My idea is to use nonliving copies of ourselves (our code, but a nonliving copy of it) and use it to communicate with everyone else's nonliving copy and any piece of information out there that we come across, then run all the information past our nonliving copies so that we can first ensure all our permission sets are being adhered to and everyone, including ourselves, is fully respected at any given time. This data processing will be happening in the background so we could still be consciously surprised by what happens, while our nonliving copy represents us and makes sure that nothing happens to us that we wouldn't want to let happen.

—

From what I've gathered about reality, there isn't a past somewhere waiting for someone to traverse it, for that you would need to reverse everything. It doesn't exist anymore. The movement has passed. There is a new configuration. There is only the present; the past is gone, but may be retrieved if we reverse everything.

Earth & the Sun have changed, the cause & effect chains have shifted, matter has been dispersed, reorganized, but not just here, everywhere shifts.

There is only ever NOW continually.

NOW is the current configuration, but it is a changing one, as movement, unlike time, is very real. So there was a past, obviously, but it doesn't exist anymore because reality and that which it is comprised of (lets say particles and forces) has changed locations, shifted, and is now configured differently.

I.e Time has passed, but time doesn't exist. What really happened was movement occurred and realities configuration is now changed, but, of course, it updates continually -- the cause and effect chains. Remember, however, that as a lifeform that can choose, regardless of it being cause & effect, you must still choose, and let that choice be to work to Achieve Reality Respected. Thank you.

—

We are things, living things, but things nonetheless. We are data and reasons and reasonings, but we lack the entire dataset, both our formulary data (the data that is us, what we're comprised of) and external data, what exists beyond our bounds, out for us to behold in reality common, the reality we share. We have bits & pieces of each, but we are missing the complete dataset, everything we are and everything we interact with. The goal is to have all relevant data needed to make a determination when interacting w/ others and even the self. Nonliving copies of our code (dataset, initial + combined w/ additional acquired data) could talk & navigate all our interactions so that each person may be properly respected in an exchange involving an absolute consent, which is consenting with an absolute and perfect understanding of all relevant data.

—

We desperately need the Universal Identity Program -- Mandatory DNA, Fingerprints, GPS positioning — what would happen, and this would deter many criminals from even breaking the law, but what would happen is when a crime is committed, a court order when granted would be able to determine who was actually at that location or whom was near the individual if someone experienced the crime themselves, Bodycams and panic buttons, Audio/Visual surveillance w/ autodetect, shoe size, etc. of every single human within our domain (earth and beyond).

—

In the future, and even now to varying degrees, we'll be able to program our actions to have perfect precision. Say I wanted to make a basket, I analyze the distance, weight of the object, angle of which I throw it, wind that may be a factor, and every variable related to making that basket and voila, the basket is made.

—

We should be laying the groundwork to have future generations reverse reality and bring us back. Careful not to let evil gain a foothold, for if the wrong people or thing (say, a nonliving construct) reverse reality, we may die and then instantly (instantly because it's all linear and it would be as if no time had transpired at all) wake up in a hell of someone's design, and imagine that with the divisible principal it gets worse and worse forever and ever. Please, government, do not treat this lightly. Securing reality for the freedom of all life is the ultimate good. I fear what may happen should the power to reverse reality falls into the wrong hands. For any who want people to end up in a hell, why is that? You know you have no objective right to stick people in a hell. If that is why you aren't doing anything, or are even working in the opposite direction (doing something, but because you want reality disrespected and want people in hells, you're working towards that end), what if the people in power that come after you are evil too and decide that, even though you yourself are evil, that they will still stick you in a hell too. I hope you are not evil, but I don't live on hopes. I'm working to convert you to reason, whether your currently good (to then further the conversion) or are evil (in which case it is vital that I fully convert you to reason).

—

I fear that evil (evil being when reality is not respected, whether it's a person not being respected or say it's some situation and its realities that are being ignored) may win and I do not want that to happen. I fear that a hell could be created and people thrown inside, stuck forever and with shrink down and thus infinite energy, it could get worse and worse forever and ever. The pain amplified ad infinitum.

Work with me and let's work to see this does not happen. Evil must not win. All forces of good converge, unite, use your brain power and begin converting people to reason, which is the respect of/for reality, person and circumstance alike.

—

I put forward for your consideration that all of reality is governed by cause & effect and that everything happens for reasons, because. Even life, even in our choice, that thing which we choose is done for reasons and never leaves or disembarks from being cause & effect. Though still choice, but for reasons. The future is determined by what we choose. We are not mere slaves to cause & effect, but are rather living instruments that develop the future as time unfolds. We can be the cause & we can see the effect, measure it. May we also measure the steps needed to achieve reality respected, for it is the most noble goal & the objective literal best outcome there is.

Click Topics for even more information